Skip to content

Report Section 2: Recommendations

Research workbench, not a finished commentary page.

This page is generated from processed source text and candidate catalogs. It exists to help researchers decide what to verify, promote, and deeply decode next.

FieldValue
SourceInvestigation of Some Trouble in the Generating System of the Commonwealth Edison Co.
Year1919
Section IDcommonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-section-01-recommendations
LocationPDF pages 7-12, lines 145-720
Statuspdf-text-extracted-candidate
Word Count2384
Equation Candidates In Section0
Figure Candidates In Section0
Quote Candidates In Section0
RECOMMENDATIONS From the investigation, the following recommendations appear to me justified: 1.) To reduce the liability of trouble, by carefully going over all the controlling devices, such as relays, current transformers, circuit breaker-operating mechanisms, etc., especially those at or near the gen- erating stations to ascertain whether they are in perfect condition and whether they are of the most reliable and safest type now available, and where necessary replace them or change them to the safest and most reliable now available for the existing conditions of operation. It must be expected, that during the time which many of the controlling devices have been in operation in the system, advances have been made in type and design of circuit controlling devices. The conditions of operation have become more severe, due to the increase of the size
... mmendations appear to me justified: 1.) To reduce the liability of trouble, by carefully going over all the controlling devices, such as relays, current transformers, circuit breaker-operating mechanisms, etc., especially those at or near the gen- erating stations to ascertain whether they are in perfect condition and whether they are of the most reliable and safest type now available, and where necessary replace them or change them to the safest and most reliable now available for the existing conditions of operation. It must be expected, that during the tim ...
... peak loads of the day, when the cables are at their maximum tempera- tures. I understand that simple devices for getting high voltage direct current for testing purposes have been developed. 3.) To cut off the troubles from the generating stations by the in- stallation of feeder reactances. By far the largest majority of troubles leading to short circuit occur in the feeder cables and beyond them, in the substations, but very few only in the generators, and extremely few on the busbars. The gen- erators have power limiting reactors, but no power limiting reactors ...
... w reactances, two at the Northwest Station, one at Fisk A, and one at Fisk B, for the interconnection with the Northwest Station. Each of the reactors then would be about .875 ohms (half the size of the present power limiting busbar reactors) . Such an arrangement may require a slight increase of excitation of the synchronous converters in the substations connected to these tie cables, to keep their voltage by giving the current a slight lead. Another possibility, which might be more convenient, would be to install normal feeder reactors at each end of each o ...
... should thus be investigated. Similar results are given by grouping in pairs of identical cables with differential relays between them. This latter arrangement perhaps is somewhat less sensitive and reliable, since with two separate cables, no matter how identical they may be, a transient may occur in the one and not or a different transient in the other, and the sensitivity of the differential relay thus probably has to be lowered not to be affected by transients. On the other hand, the latter arrangement would not require such extensive replacement of cables. S ...
Concept CandidateHits In SectionStatus
Short circuit12pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Synchronism6pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Tie cable4pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Circuit breaker3pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Power limiting reactor2pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Synchronizing power2pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Current transformer1pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Term CandidateHits In SectionStatus
synchronous apparatus4pdf-text-extracted-candidate
tie cable4pdf-text-extracted-candidate
power limiting reactance3pdf-text-extracted-candidate
feeder reactance2pdf-text-extracted-candidate
power limiting reactor2pdf-text-extracted-candidate
synchronizing power2pdf-text-extracted-candidate
busbar reactance1pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Candidate IDOCR / PDF-Text CandidateSource Location
No chapter-local candidates yet--
Candidate IDOCR / PDF-Text CandidateSource Location
No chapter-local candidates yet--
Candidate IDCandidate PassageSource Location
No chapter-local candidates yet--
  • Ether references: Verify exact wording before drawing conclusions. Ether language must be separated from later interpretive systems.
  • Impedance / reactance: Translate historical opposition terms into modern impedance, admittance, conductance, susceptance, and complex-plane notation.
  • Radiation / light: Compare the chapter’s radiation vocabulary with modern electromagnetic radiation, spectral frequency, wavelength, absorption, and illumination engineering.
  • Transients / damping: Separate the temporary term from the final steady-state term and compare with differential-equation response language.
  • Alternating current: Compare Steinmetz’s AC language with modern sinusoidal steady-state analysis, RMS quantities, phase, and phasor notation.
  • Ether references: If Steinmetz mentions ether, quote only the verified source words first; any broader ether-field synthesis belongs in a labeled interpretive layer.
  • Radiation / light: Radiation and wave language can invite ether-field comparison, but source wording, modern radiation theory, and speculative synthesis must stay separated.
  • Transients / damping: Transient collapse, impulse, and surge behavior can be compared with alternative field language, but only as a clearly marked reading.
  1. Open the full source text and the scan or raw PDF.
  2. Verify the chapter boundary and surrounding context.
  3. Promote exact quotations only after checking the source image.
  4. Move mathematical candidates into canonical equation pages only after formula typography is corrected.
  5. Move diagram candidates into the diagram archive only after image extraction, crop verification, and manifest creation.
  6. Keep Steinmetz wording, modern translation, and ether-field interpretation in separate labeled layers.