Skip to content

Mathematical Appendix 5: Appendix: Synchronous Operation

Research workbench, not a finished commentary page.

This page is generated from processed source text and candidate catalogs. It exists to help researchers decide what to verify, promote, and deeply decode next.

FieldValue
SourceInvestigation of Some Trouble in the Generating System of the Commonwealth Edison Co.
Year1919
Section IDcommonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-appendix-01-synchronous-operation
LocationPDF pages 27-68, lines 2165-5013
Statuspdf-text-extracted-candidate
Word Count8812
Equation Candidates In Section220
Figure Candidates In Section1
Quote Candidates In Section1
Appendix [[END_PDF_PAGE:27]] [[PDF_PAGE:28]] 22 Report of Charles P. Steinmetz APPENDIX Synchronous Operation A Consider the case of two alternators or groups of alternators such as station sections, which are running in synchronism with each other, that is, have the same frequency f, but are connected together while out of phase with each other by angle 2w. That is, the one alternator has the voltage phase (<f> to), the other the voltage phase (0+w). We may assume the alternators as of equal voltage, since a voltage difference superposes on the synchronizing energy current due to the phase difference, a reactive magnetizing current due to the voltage difference without materially changing the energy relations. The EMFs of the two alternators then may be represented by: ei = E cos (0 co) 1 e2 = Ecos (0+co) /
... ) 1 e2 = Ecos (0+co) / (1) and the resultant voltage in the circuit between the alternators then is : e = ei e 2 = E cos \ (<f> co) cos (</>+ co) [ = 2E sin co sin (2) and the interchange currentwbeteen the alternators is: 2E . i = sin co sin (<j> a) (3) where: z = r2+x 2 is the impedance of the circuit between the two alternators, and the phase angle a is given by: x tan a = - r and: r= resistance x = reactance of the circuit between the alternators (including their internal resistances and reactances). [[END_PDF_PAGE:28]] [[PDF_PAGE:29]] Report of Charles P. S ...
Appendix [[END_PDF_PAGE:27]] [[PDF_PAGE:28]] 22 Report of Charles P. Steinmetz APPENDIX Synchronous Operation A Consider the case of two alternators or groups of alternators such as station sections, which are running in synchronism with each other, that is, have the same frequency f, but are connected together while out of phase with each other by angle 2w. That is, the one alternator has the voltage phase (<f> to), the other the voltage phase (0+w). We may assume the alternators as of equal voltage, since a voltage difference superposes on the synchroniz ...
... but pulsates with approximately constant low frequency, the frequency of the beat, and decreasing amplitude. co =co oe = maximum value of the phase angle, then may approximately represent the gradually decreasing amplitude of the phase angle, where a = attenuation of the beat or oscillation, and -at . ... co=a>oo sin pc/> (5; would approximately represent the instantaneous value of the phase angle co where: pf= frequency of the beat, or the periodic variation of the phase angle. [In the derivation of equations (3) and (4), co has been assumed as constant. As co is ...
... [[PDF_PAGE:28]] 22 Report of Charles P. Steinmetz APPENDIX Synchronous Operation A Consider the case of two alternators or groups of alternators such as station sections, which are running in synchronism with each other, that is, have the same frequency f, but are connected together while out of phase with each other by angle 2w. That is, the one alternator has the voltage phase (<f> to), the other the voltage phase (0+w). We may assume the alternators as of equal voltage, since a voltage difference superposes on the synchronizing energy current due to the ...
Concept CandidateHits In SectionStatus
Synchronism84pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Synchronizing power20pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Synchronous machines6pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Power limiting reactor5pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Tie cable5pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Term CandidateHits In SectionStatus
synchronizing power20pdf-text-extracted-candidate
power limiting reactor5pdf-text-extracted-candidate
tie cable5pdf-text-extracted-candidate
critical slip4pdf-text-extracted-candidate
Candidate IDOCR / PDF-Text CandidateSource Location
commonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-eq-sync-emfs-0001e1 = E cos(…); e2 = E cos(…), OCR candidatelines 2211-2217
commonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-eq-resultant-voltage-0002e = e1 - e2 = 2E sin(…) sin(…), OCR candidatelines 2218-2230
commonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-eq-interchange-current-0003i = (2E / z) sin(…) sin(…), OCR candidatelines 2231-2239
commonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-eq-impedance-angle-0004z = sqrt(r^2 + x^2); tan a = x / r, OCR candidatelines 2240-2255
commonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-eq-frequency-slip-0005one alternator frequency (1 - s)f, the other (1 + s)f, OCR candidatelines 2571-2591
commonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-eq-max-sync-power-condition-0006x2 = 2x1 + x, OCR candidatelines 3557-3561
commonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-eq-candidate-0007ei = E cos (0line 2212
commonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-eq-candidate-0008e2 = Ecos (0+co)line 2215
Candidate IDOCR / PDF-Text CandidateSource Location
commonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-fig-001Appendix Figure 1, candidate reference for synchronous-operation current and voltage curves.lines 2560-2570
Candidate IDCandidate PassageSource Location
commonwealth-edison-generating-system-trouble-quote-maximum-synchronizing-power-reactancelines 3562-3599
  • Impedance / reactance: Translate historical opposition terms into modern impedance, admittance, conductance, susceptance, and complex-plane notation.
  • Radiation / light: Compare the chapter’s radiation vocabulary with modern electromagnetic radiation, spectral frequency, wavelength, absorption, and illumination engineering.
  • Transients / damping: Separate the temporary term from the final steady-state term and compare with differential-equation response language.
  • Ether references: Verify exact wording before drawing conclusions. Ether language must be separated from later interpretive systems.
  • Field language: Read for whether field language is mechanical, geometrical, causal, descriptive, or simply a convenient engineering model.
  • Radiation / light: Radiation and wave language can invite ether-field comparison, but source wording, modern radiation theory, and speculative synthesis must stay separated.
  • Transients / damping: Transient collapse, impulse, and surge behavior can be compared with alternative field language, but only as a clearly marked reading.
  • Ether references: If Steinmetz mentions ether, quote only the verified source words first; any broader ether-field synthesis belongs in a labeled interpretive layer.
  • Field language: Field-pressure or field-gradient interpretations can be explored here only after the explicit source passage and modern engineering translation are kept distinct.
  1. Open the full source text and the scan or raw PDF.
  2. Verify the chapter boundary and surrounding context.
  3. Promote exact quotations only after checking the source image.
  4. Move mathematical candidates into canonical equation pages only after formula typography is corrected.
  5. Move diagram candidates into the diagram archive only after image extraction, crop verification, and manifest creation.
  6. Keep Steinmetz wording, modern translation, and ether-field interpretation in separate labeled layers.