Skip to content

Chapter 3: Law Of Electro-Magnetic Induction

Research workbench, not a finished commentary page.

This page is generated from processed source text and candidate catalogs. It exists to help researchers decide what to verify, promote, and deeply decode next.

FieldValue
SourceTheory and Calculation of Alternating Current Phenomena
Year1900
Section IDtheory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1900-chapter-03
Locationlines 1606-1742
Statuscandidate
Word Count724
Equation Candidates In Section12
Figure Candidates In Section0
Quote Candidates In Section0
CHAPTER III. LAW OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC INDUCTION. 11. If an electric conductor moves relatively to a mag- netic field, an E.M.F. is induced in the conductor which is proportional to the intensity of the magnetic field, to the length of the conductor, and to the speed of its motion perpendicular to the magnetic field and the direction of the conductor ; or, in other words, proportional to the number of lines of magnetic force cut per second by the conductor. As a practical unit of E.M.F., the volt is defined as the E.M.F. induced in a conductor, which cuts 108 = 100,000,000 lines of magnetic force per second. If the conductor is closed upon itself, the induced E.M.F. produces a current. A closed conductor may be called a turn or a convolution. In such a turn,
CHAPTER III. LAW OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC INDUCTION. 11. If an electric conductor moves relatively to a mag- netic field, an E.M.F. is induced in the conductor which is proportional to the intensity of the magnetic field, to the length of the conductor, and to the speed of its motion perpendicular to the magnetic ...
CHAPTER III. LAW OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC INDUCTION. 11. If an electric conductor moves relatively to a mag- netic field, an E.M.F. is induced in the conductor which is proportional to the intensity of the magnetic field, to the length of the conductor, and to the speed of its motion perpendicular to the magnetic field and the direction of the conductor ; or, in other words, proportional to th ...
... the flux, or the flux passes in and out of the turns, the total flux is cut four times during each complete period or cycle, twice passing into, and twice out of, the turns. LAW OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC INDUCTION. 17 Hence, if N= number of complete cycles per second, or the frequency of the flux 3>, the average E.M.F. induced in n turns is, £&vg, = 4 « 3> N 10 ~ 8 volts. This is the fundamental equation of electrical engineer- ing, and applies to .continuous-current, as well as to alter- nating-current, apparatus. 12. In continuous-current machines ...
... S>, produced by a current of / amperes effective, or / V2 amperes maximum, is therefore — n® =Z/V2 108; and consequently the effective E.M.F. of self-inductance is: E = V2 =' 2 TT NLI volts. The product, x = 2 vNL, is of the dimension of resistance, and is called the reactance of the circuit ; and the E.M.F. of self-inductance of the circuit, or the reactance voltage, is E = Ix, and lags 90° behind the current, since the current is in phase with the magnetic flux produced by the current, and the E.M.F. lags 90° behind the magnetic flux. The E. ...
Concept CandidateHits In SectionStatus
Frequency3seeded
Ether1seeded
Term CandidateHits In SectionStatus
ether1seeded
Candidate IDOCR / PDF-Text CandidateSource Location
theory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1900-eq-candidate-0052E.M.F. induced in a conductor, which cuts 108 = 100,000,000line 1619
theory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1900-eq-candidate-0053of the flux inclosed by the turns, times 10~8.line 1632
theory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1900-eq-candidate-0054£&vg, = 4 « 3> N 10 ~ 8 volts.line 1652
theory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1900-eq-candidate-0055machine is E = 4«4>7V10~8 volts, independent of the num-line 1667
theory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1900-eq-candidate-0056£avg = 4 « 4> JVW ~ 8 volts.line 1675
theory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1900-eq-candidate-0057^“max. = 27r»<S>7V710-8VOltS.line 1682
theory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1900-eq-candidate-0058= 4.44 n 4>^10- 8 volts,line 1691
theory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1900-eq-candidate-0059flux X number of turns X 10~8line 1703
Candidate IDOCR / PDF-Text CandidateSource Location
No chapter-local candidates yet--
Candidate IDCandidate PassageSource Location
No chapter-local candidates yet--
  • Magnetism: Track flux, reluctance, permeability, magnetizing force, and loss language against modern magnetic-circuit terminology.
  • Field language: Read for whether field language is mechanical, geometrical, causal, descriptive, or simply a convenient engineering model.
  • Radiation / light: Compare the chapter’s radiation vocabulary with modern electromagnetic radiation, spectral frequency, wavelength, absorption, and illumination engineering.
  • Impedance / reactance: Translate historical opposition terms into modern impedance, admittance, conductance, susceptance, and complex-plane notation.
  • Waves / transmission lines: Map Steinmetz’s wave and line language onto modern distributed constants, propagation velocity, standing waves, and reflections.
  • Magnetism: Centrifugal/divergent magnetic-field readings are interpretive overlays, not automatic historical claims.
  • Field language: Field-pressure or field-gradient interpretations can be explored here only after the explicit source passage and modern engineering translation are kept distinct.
  • Radiation / light: Radiation and wave language can invite ether-field comparison, but source wording, modern radiation theory, and speculative synthesis must stay separated.
  • Waves / transmission lines: Standing/traveling wave passages may support richer field interpretations; the page keeps those readings separate from verified Steinmetz wording.
  1. Open the full source text and the scan or raw PDF.
  2. Verify the chapter boundary and surrounding context.
  3. Promote exact quotations only after checking the source image.
  4. Move mathematical candidates into canonical equation pages only after formula typography is corrected.
  5. Move diagram candidates into the diagram archive only after image extraction, crop verification, and manifest creation.
  6. Keep Steinmetz wording, modern translation, and ether-field interpretation in separate labeled layers.