Skip to content

Chapter 16: Aiitebnatingh-Current Osnebator

Research workbench, not a finished commentary page.

This page is generated from processed source text and candidate catalogs. It exists to help researchers decide what to verify, promote, and deeply decode next.

FieldValue
SourceTheory and Calculation of Alternating Current Phenomena
Year1897
Section IDtheory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1897-chapter-16
Locationlines 17025-18828
Statuscandidate
Word Count2451
Equation Candidates In Section0
Figure Candidates In Section2
Quote Candidates In Section0
CHAPTER XVI. AIiTEBNATINGh-CURRENT OSNEBATOR. 159. In the alternating-current generator, E.M.F. is induced in the armature conductors by their relative motion through a constant or approximately constant magnetic field. When yielding current, two distinctly different M.M.Fs. are acting upon the alternator armature — the M.M.F. of the field due to the field-exciting spools, and the M.M.F. of the armature current. The former is constant, or approx- imately so, while the latter is alternating, and in synchro- nous motion relatively to the former ; hence, fixed in space relative to the field M.M.F., or uni-directional, but pulsating in a single-phase alternator. In the polyphase alternator, when evenly loaded or balanced, the resultant M.M.F. of the armature current is more or less constant. The E.M.F. induced in the armature is due to the mag- netic flux passing through
CHAPTER XVI. AIiTEBNATINGh-CURRENT OSNEBATOR. 159. In the alternating-current generator, E.M.F. is induced in the armature conductors by their relative motion through a constant or approximately constant magnetic field. When yielding current, two distinctly different M.M.Fs. are acting upon the alternator armature — the M.M.F. of the field due to the field-exciting spools, and the M.M.F. of the armature current. The former is constant, or approx- imately so, while the latter is alternati ...
CHAPTER XVI. AIiTEBNATINGh-CURRENT OSNEBATOR. 159. In the alternating-current generator, E.M.F. is induced in the armature conductors by their relative motion through a constant or approximately constant magnetic field. When yielding current, two distinctly different M.M.Fs. are acting upon the alternator armature — the M.M.F. of the field due to the field-exciting spools, and the M.M.F. of the armature current. The former is constant, or approx- imately so, while the latter is al ...
... CURRENT PHENOMENA. [§ 160 density at the trailing-pole corner. Since the internal self- inductance of the alternator alone causes a certain lag of the current behind the induced E.M.F., this condition of no displacement can exist only in a circuit with external nega- tive reactance, as capacity, etc. If the armature current lags, it reaches the maximum later than the E.M.F. ; that is, in a position where the armature coil partly faces the following-field pole, as shown in diagram in Fig. 111. Since the armature current flows Fiq. Ill, in opposit ...
CHAPTER XVI. AIiTEBNATINGh-CURRENT OSNEBATOR. 159. In the alternating-current generator, E.M.F. is induced in the armature conductors by their relative motion through a constant or approximately constant magnetic field. When yielding current, two distinctly different M.M.Fs. are acting upon the alternator armature — the M.M.F. of the field due to t ...
Concept CandidateHits In SectionStatus
Frequency1seeded
Light1seeded
Term CandidateHits In SectionStatus
No chapter-local term hits yet--
Candidate IDOCR / PDF-Text CandidateSource Location
No chapter-local candidates yet--
Candidate IDOCR / PDF-Text CandidateSource Location
theory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1897-fig-110also. Thus, we have, in this case, even on open circuit, no Fig. 110. rotation through a constant magnetic field, but rotation through a pulsating field, which makes the E.M.F…line 17072
theory-calculation-alternating-current-phenomena-1897-fig-112its maximum while the armature coil still partly faces the Fig. 112. preceding-field pole, as shown in diagram Fig. 112, — it tendsline 17126
Candidate IDCandidate PassageSource Location
No chapter-local candidates yet--
  • Field language: Read for whether field language is mechanical, geometrical, causal, descriptive, or simply a convenient engineering model.
  • Magnetism: Track flux, reluctance, permeability, magnetizing force, and loss language against modern magnetic-circuit terminology.
  • Impedance / reactance: Translate historical opposition terms into modern impedance, admittance, conductance, susceptance, and complex-plane notation.
  • Alternating current: Compare Steinmetz’s AC language with modern sinusoidal steady-state analysis, RMS quantities, phase, and phasor notation.
  • Waves / transmission lines: Map Steinmetz’s wave and line language onto modern distributed constants, propagation velocity, standing waves, and reflections.
  • Field language: Field-pressure or field-gradient interpretations can be explored here only after the explicit source passage and modern engineering translation are kept distinct.
  • Magnetism: Centrifugal/divergent magnetic-field readings are interpretive overlays, not automatic historical claims.
  • Waves / transmission lines: Standing/traveling wave passages may support richer field interpretations; the page keeps those readings separate from verified Steinmetz wording.
  1. Open the full source text and the scan or raw PDF.
  2. Verify the chapter boundary and surrounding context.
  3. Promote exact quotations only after checking the source image.
  4. Move mathematical candidates into canonical equation pages only after formula typography is corrected.
  5. Move diagram candidates into the diagram archive only after image extraction, crop verification, and manifest creation.
  6. Keep Steinmetz wording, modern translation, and ether-field interpretation in separate labeled layers.