Skip to content

Apparatus Subsection 49: Direct-current Commutating Machines: C. Commutating Machines 181

Research workbench, not a finished commentary page.

This page is generated from processed source text and candidate catalogs. It exists to help researchers decide what to verify, promote, and deeply decode next.

FieldValue
SourceTheoretical Elements of Electrical Engineering
Year1915
Section IDtheoretical-elements-electrical-engineering-section-49
Locationlines 10941-11024
Statuscandidate
Word Count496
Equation Candidates In Section0
Figure Candidates In Section0
Quote Candidates In Section0
D. C. COMMUTATING MACHINES 181 With the brushes set midway between adjacent field poles, the armature m.m.f. is additive on one side and subtractive on the other side of the center of the field pole. Thus the magnetic intensity is increased on one side and decreased on the other. The total m.m.f., however, and thus, neglecting saturation, the total flux entering the armature, are not changed. Thus, arma- ture reaction, with the brushes midway between adjacent field poles, acts distorting upon the field, but neither magnetizes nor demagnetizes, if the field is below saturation. The distortion of the magnetic field takes place by the arma- ture ampere-turns beneath the pole, or from B to C. Thus, if T = pole arc, that is, the angle covered by pole face (two poles or one complete period
D. C. COMMUTATING MACHINES 181 With the brushes set midway between adjacent field poles, the armature m.m.f. is additive on one side and subtractive on the other side of the center of the field pole. Thus the magnetic intensity is increased on one side and decreased on the other. The total m.m.f., however, and thus, neglecting saturation, the total flux entering the armature, are not changed. Thus, arma- ture reaction, with the brushes midway between adjac ...
D. C. COMMUTATING MACHINES 181 With the brushes set midway between adjacent field poles, the armature m.m.f. is additive on one side and subtractive on the other side of the center of the field pole. Thus the magnetic intensity is increased on one side and decreased on the other. The total m.m.f., however, and thus, ...
Concept CandidateHits In SectionStatus
No chapter-local term hits yet--
Term CandidateHits In SectionStatus
No chapter-local term hits yet--
Candidate IDOCR / PDF-Text CandidateSource Location
No chapter-local candidates yet--
Candidate IDOCR / PDF-Text CandidateSource Location
No chapter-local candidates yet--
Candidate IDCandidate PassageSource Location
No chapter-local candidates yet--
  • Magnetism: Track flux, reluctance, permeability, magnetizing force, and loss language against modern magnetic-circuit terminology.
  • Field language: Read for whether field language is mechanical, geometrical, causal, descriptive, or simply a convenient engineering model.
  • Magnetism: Centrifugal/divergent magnetic-field readings are interpretive overlays, not automatic historical claims.
  • Field language: Field-pressure or field-gradient interpretations can be explored here only after the explicit source passage and modern engineering translation are kept distinct.
  1. Open the full source text and the scan or raw PDF.
  2. Verify the chapter boundary and surrounding context.
  3. Promote exact quotations only after checking the source image.
  4. Move mathematical candidates into canonical equation pages only after formula typography is corrected.
  5. Move diagram candidates into the diagram archive only after image extraction, crop verification, and manifest creation.
  6. Keep Steinmetz wording, modern translation, and ether-field interpretation in separate labeled layers.